Legal Opinion

Bao Ge v. Li Peng

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 17, 2000No. CIV. 98-1986(TFH)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Pending before this Court is the plaintiffs’ Motion for Amendment of Judgment of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of August 28, 2000, dismissing the above captioned case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion, the oppositions thereto,1 and the entire record, the Court will deny the plaintiffs’ motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This case is a proposed class action lawsuit brought against the Chinese Politburo, Politburo Chairman Li Peng, the Bank of China (in New York) and several corporate branches…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Amoco Production Company v. Thomas A. Fry, Director, Minerals Management ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Assassination Archives & Research Center v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. FryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API