United States v. Rome
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREEDMAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ opposition to that motion deals solely with an issue that has apparently not been specifically dealt with before: Does 31 U.S.C. § 191, as applied, create and impose an unreasonable classification between proceedings involving assignments for the benefit of creditors and bankruptcy proceedings, in that section 191 is applicable to, and permits, the collection of tax penalties in assignment proceedings, but, by virtue of section 57(j) of the Bankruptcy Act, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. KeySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Boese v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mickelson v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- United States Department of Interior v. James W. Elliott, Jr., Trustee, in Re Elkins Energy Corp., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Bank of West v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- JNC COMPANIES v. MeehanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Bank of West v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.