Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1973No. 260, 618 and 619, Dockets 71-1902, 72-1993 and 72-2312Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTimbers, Circuit Judge

With one exception, I concur in the judgment of the Court and in the able majority opinion of Judge Smith.

With the utmost deference to and respect for my colleagues, however, I am constrained to dissent from the judgment of the Court and the majority opinion to the extent that they modify the injunctive relief found necessary by the district court to protect Jacqueline Onas-

*1000sis and her children, Caroline B. and John F. Kennedy, Jr., from the continued predatory conduct of the self-proclaimed paparazzo Galella.

We start with what I take to be common ground that “a district court has broad…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. Brumby Metals, Inc. v. BargenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,660 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Harold P. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API