In re N.L., Juvenile
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRobinson, J.
¶ 31. These cases are hard. Termination of parental rights may sever an established parent-child relationship that is both constitutionally protected and potentially vitally important to child and parent alike. But the failure to terminate when the evidence warrants it risks extending a period of uncertainty, with potential adverse impacts on the very children the laws seek to protect. I believe the best way to manage these difficulties is to rely on the system we have established-one in which a factfinder who can directly observe the witnesses and review the evidence in that context…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re S.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In re N. H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- In re D.M. & T.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.