Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re N.L., Juvenile

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 8, 2019No. 2018-289Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRobinson, J.

¶ 31. These cases are hard. Termination of parental rights may sever an established parent-child relationship that is both constitutionally protected and potentially vitally important to child and parent alike. But the failure to terminate when the evidence warrants it risks extending a period of uncertainty, with potential adverse impacts on the very children the laws seek to protect. I believe the best way to manage these difficulties is to rely on the system we have established-one in which a factfinder who can directly observe the witnesses and review the evidence in that context…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. In re S.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. In re N. H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. In re D.M. & T.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API