Legal Opinion

United States v. Schnejer Zalman Gurary and Nochum Sternberg

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 16, 1986No. 1436, Docket 86-1209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

The Speedy Trial Act normally requires return of an indictment within thirty days after a defendant has been arrested, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b) (1982), but permits a continuance upon a determination that “the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,” id. § 3161(h)(8)(A). Rule 5(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that a defendant, not in custody, be accorded a preliminary hearing, for a determination of probable cause, within twenty days of his initial appearance but…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Schnejer Zalman Gurary, Nochum Sternberg and Esther SternbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. VAUGHN v. KIELDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  5. VAUGHN v. KIELDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API