City of Duluth v. Esterly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Duluth of the ■offense of obstructing the street with an automobile, in violation of the ordinance. He appealed to the district court for St. Louis county, where the judgment was affirmed, Ensign, Cant and Hughes, JJ. From the order of affirmance, defendant appealed to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Start, C. .1.
The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Duluth of the offense of wilfully obstructing with an automobile Superior street, contrary to an ordinance of the city, which, so far as here material, is to the effect following: It shall be unlawful for any person to obstruct or incumber, or cause to be obstructed or in-numbered, any street of the city of Duluth with vehicles of any de*65seription. The defendant appealed from the judgment to the district ¡court of -the county of St. Louis. The judgment was affirmed, and the defendant appealed to this court.
The sole…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RayantisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. MessolongitisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morrow v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001