State v. Rayantis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, S. D. Bayantis, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Minneapolis, Charles B. EUiott, J., entered June 30, 1893, adjudging him guilty of a violation of a city ordinance and fining Mm $50 and in default of payment committing him to tbe workhouse until it be paid, not exceeding sixty days. The Charter of the City of Minneapolis, Sp.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant, S. D. Bayantis, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Minneapolis, Charles B. EUiott, J., entered June 30, 1893, adjudging him guilty of a violation of a city ordinance and fining Mm $50 and in default of payment committing him to tbe workhouse until it be paid, not exceeding sixty days. The Charter of the City of Minneapolis, Sp. Laws 1881, ch. 76, subch. 4, § 5, subd. 6, provides that the City Council shall have power to pass ordinances to prevent the incumbering of streets with carriages, carts, wagons or sleighs. The City Council accordingly passed the…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of a violation of a section of one of the ordinances providing “that no person shall erect, build, set up, keep, or maintain any house, store, shop, or other building or structure; or leave, deposit, or place any boxes, merchandise, * * * trucks, carts, *129wagons, sbeds, or carriages upon or in any street * * * in said city.” It was admitted that at the time of the alleged offense defendant was a duly-licensed “push-cart peddler,” and from the evidence for the prosecution it appears that he was arrested by a policeman…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FentonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schilling v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City of Duluth v. EsterlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State v. MessolongitisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898