Legal Opinion

City of Lakewood v. Hartman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. 98-1368PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The sole issue presented here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in restricting Hartman’s driving privileges and ordering that she have an ignition interlock device installed in her automobile as a condition of probation for the offense to which she pled guilty, driving without a valid operator’s license. For the reasons that follow, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the conditions of probation under the circumstances of this case.

A trial court is vested with discretion in determining the proper conditions of probation. R.C. 2951.02; State v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mansfield v. StuderOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. PattonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In Re D.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API