Legal Opinion

Tate v. Evans

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*420 Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Scott, Judge.

Tate and Hopkins sued Evans and Dougherty as acceptors of the following bill of exchange.

New Qreeans, Nov. 28,1839.

Four months after date, this first of exchange, second unpaid, pay Tate & Hopkins, or order, one thousand five hundred dollars, value received, and charge the same to account.

Your ob’t. serv’t,,

J. S. Arnold.

To Messrs. Evans & Dougherty. St. Louis.

The plaintiffs gave in evidence the following written an-thority, executed by Evans and Dougherty to J. S. Arnold, to draw the said bill of exchange.

St. Louis, 28th Nov., 1839.

We hereby…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Batty v. CarswellNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Bank of the State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. GivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  4. Bank of Deer Lodge v. Hope Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Adams Express Co. v. RenoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API