State v. Bank of the State of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. I. No valid sale of the stock in question could be made by the agent appointed to make sale thereof, under act of^March 5, 1866, unless he complied strictly with the requirements of the act. The attempt on the part of Fogg to dispose of tke stock without notice to the public, as required by the act, was such an abuse as rendered the whole proceeding void. (Sedgw. on Stat. and Const.
Read the full summary
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. I. No valid sale of the stock in question could be made by the agent appointed to make sale thereof, under act of^March 5, 1866, unless he complied strictly with the requirements of the act. The attempt on the part of Fogg to dispose of tke stock without notice to the public, as required by the act, was such an abuse as rendered the whole proceeding void. (Sedgw. on Stat. and Const. Law, 347, 350-5, 687; Paley on Agency, 178-9, 202, 212-14; 8' Paige, 527; 7 Hill, 431; 26 Wend. 192; Blackf. on Tax Tit. 35-40, 54-7; Sto. on Cont. 67-8, § 70.) H. Bogg, in…
1Opinion of the Court · WagnerWagner, Judge
The controversy in this case- grows out of the question as to who is rightfully entitled to certain dividends arising out of shares of stock of the defendant, a corporation. The facts in the case appear to be briefly these:. The plaintiff, as trustee of the school and seminary fund, and in its own right, held and owned a large number of shares of stock in the bank. On the 30th day of June, 1866, dividends on those shares were declared to the amount of $104,410.75. On the 26th day of July, 1866, the governor, and also the treasurer of the State, demanded of the bank payment to the State of the…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · WagneR.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brady v. . the Mayor, C., of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Delafield v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- City of St. Louis v. TiefelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- State v. MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State of Texas v. Ragland Clinic-HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. O'malley.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State ex rel. Blakeman v. HaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Sturgeon v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.