Legal Opinion

United States v. Minter

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1980No. NCM 79 0454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant commenced a period of unauthorized absence after arraignment but pri- or to findings during his special court-martial. The trial continued in his absence pursuant to paragraph 11c, Manual for Courts-Martial, 1969 (Rev.), after a determination by the military judge that the absence was voluntary and unauthorized. Pleas of not guilty to two unauthorized absences of 21 days and 23 days were entered and the court, sitting with members, after receiving evidence, returned findings of guilty to both offenses and sentenced appellant to the maximum sentence it could award. Appellant had no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HoughtalingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. HardinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API