Legal Opinion

United States v. Houghtaling

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1953No. 573PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Bkosman, Judge:

The four appellants, Houghtaling, Yambrick, Woods, and Storbakken, were convicted by general court-martial, following a joint trial, of the offense of rape, in violation of Article of War 92, 10 U. S. C. § 1564. The findings, and non-capital sentences have been approved by the convening authority and affirmed by a board of review. Petition for consideration by this Court was granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the trial in absentia of the accused Private First Class Gordon A. Storbakken was legal.
“2. Whether the evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Boreing v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Ford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. BoehmUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. WellsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. StatenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API