United States v. Houghtaling
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Bkosman, Judge:
The four appellants, Houghtaling, Yambrick, Woods, and Storbakken, were convicted by general court-martial, following a joint trial, of the offense of rape, in violation of Article of War 92, 10 U. S. C. § 1564. The findings, and non-capital sentences have been approved by the convening authority and affirmed by a board of review. Petition for consideration by this Court was granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether the trial in absentia of the accused Private First Class Gordon A. Storbakken was legal.
“2. Whether the evidence was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Boreing v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Ford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. BoehmUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. WellsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. StatenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.