Legal Opinion

Jyachosky v. Wensil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1954No. 534Published

1Opinion of the Court

81 S.E.2d 644 (1954)

240 N.C. 217

JYACHOSKY

v.

WENSIL et al.

No. 534.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 1954.

Taliaferro, Grier, Parker & Poe, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Coble Funderburk, Monroe, for defendant Garmon, appellant.

Jones & Small, Charlotte, Bernard W. Cruse, Concord, for defendant Wensil, appellant.

BOBBITT, Justice.

The assignments of error upon which appellants place great stress challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant submission to the jury of the first and third issues. These assignments are directed to the refusal of the court below to sustain their motions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Jyachosky v. WensilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API