Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Cosand
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Howard Circuit Court-.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.
The complaint in this action was originally in two paragraphs. The plaintiff dismissed as to the first paragraph, the cause was put at issue, there was a trial by jury, and a verdict in favor of appellee. In the brief of appellant’s counsel, there is some discussion as to the averments of the first paragraph of the complaint, and questions which might arise thereunder in *223the evidence, but this was done under the evident apprehension that the paragraph was in the record. The completion of the record by the return to the certiorari eliminates that paragraph from the transcript, and consequently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. PriestIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Scott v. StetlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. McEwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. BurganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. PowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. GriffinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.