Legal Opinion

Coppola v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2010No. 1D09-4462Published

1Per curiam

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion of December 8, 2009, is withdrawn and the following opinion is hereby substituted therefor.

Appellant appeals an order designating him as a sexual predator upon the state’s motion made pursuant to section 775.21(5)(c), Florida Statutes. Appellant moved for rehearing and appealed when rehearing was denied. We find that our jurisdiction was not timely invoked because there is no authorization for a motion for rehearing directed to such an order. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Saintelien v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Potucek v. SmejaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Ward v. BraggDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API