Legal Opinion

Saintelien v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 28, 2008No. SC06-1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

990 So.2d 494 (2008)

Renoit SAINTELIEN, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC06-1888.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 28, 2008.

Beverly A. Pohl of Broad and Cassel, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioner.

Bill McCollum Attorney General, and Celia Terenzio, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

The district courts are in conflict regarding whether a challenge to a sexual predator designation imposed pursuant to section 775.21(5), Florida Statutes (2003), may be raised in a Florida Rule…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Cantero; Concurrence · Wells.

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Judge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jose Martinez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Blacker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. KINGRY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API