Legal Opinion
Kessel v. Long Island Railroad
Nassau County District Court
Decided February 13, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Goldstein, J.
Plaintiff, in this breach of contract action, sues for a refund which he claims is due him as a result of defective service, as well as, price and refund discrimination. Plaintiff urges that the Long Island Railroad (LIRR) has failed to perform certain services which plaintiff alleges are part of defendant’s contractual obligation. While the money sought by plaintiff is acknowledged by both plaintiff and defendant to be de minimus, the principles of this litigation have substantial meaning to both litigants.
The primary question which this court must…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kelly v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Javeline v. Long Island RailroadCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Crites v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Dominianni v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Harrison Town Court · 1981
- Fendelman v. ConrailJustice Court of Scarsdale · 1983
- Leeds v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982