Legal Opinion
Fendelman v. Conrail
Justice Court of Scarsdale
Decided March 16, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
J. Radley Herold, J.
The plaintiff, Burton Fendelman, has brought suit in the Small Claims Part of this court against the defendant, Conrail, for: “breach of a contract of carriage of plaintiff passenger during the month of July.” The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant “committed an aggravated tort against the person of the plaintiff wilfully and maliciously.” The plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $1,500 together with interest and costs. This action was tried before the court1 without a jury2 on the evening of *303January 27, 1983. The plaintiff, an attorney,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- R & I Electronics, Inc. v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Leeds v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc., Advo System, Inc. Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc. Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc., Reliance Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994