Legal Opinion

Frost v. Rand, McNally & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Declaration on the common counts; motion to exclude plaintiff’s testimony sustained; plaintiff appeals. Heard in this court at the Qctober term, 1893.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The appellants were contractors for the ornamental iron work for a magnificent building erected by the appellee — a corporation — in the city of Chicago. They sued for money which they claimed was due, having completed their contract.

The case is very voluminous, but the question for us is in a small compass.

The contract between the parties was the usual one to pay “upon the presentation of certificates signed by the ” architects, and as the architects would not give the certificates, the court held that the appellants had no case. That under such contracts architects’ certificates are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DeakmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  3. Roberts v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Mills v. WeeksIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W.H. Stubbings Co. v. World's Columbian Exposition Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Fitzgerald v. BennerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API