Legal Opinion
Rosenstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 1, 1981No. 45Published
1Opinion of the Court
284 S.E.2d 504 (1981)
Robert N. ROSENSTEIN
v.
MECHANICS & FARMERS BANK.
Wilma C. ROSENSTEIN
v.
MECHANICS & FARMERS BANK.
No. 45.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 1, 1981.
Nye, Mitchell, Jarris & Bugg by Charles B. Nye and Mount, White, King, Hutson, Walker & Carden by Richard M. Hutson, II, Durham, for plaintiff-appellants.
James B. Craven, III, Durham, for defendant-appellee.
HUSKINS, Justice:
The dispositive question posed by this appeal is whether the savings accounts were validly assigned to plaintiffs.
Bank deposits are assignable. Lipe v. Bank, 236 N.C. 328, 72 S.E.2d 759 (1952). When an…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- McCabe v. Union Dime Savings BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Rosenstein v. Mechanics & Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981