Rosenstein v. Mechanics & Farmers Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The dispositive question posed by this appeal is whether the savings accounts were validly assigned to plaintiffs.
Bank deposits are assignable. Lipe v. Bank, 236 N.C. 328, 72 S.E. 2d 759 (1952). When an individual deposits money in a bank account, a debtor-creditor relationship is established between the bank and the depositor. “The debt thus created is subject to the rule that ordinary business contracts for money due or to become due are assignable.” Id. at 331, 72 S.E. 2d at 761.
Defendant contends that this principle of assignability is subject to contrary agreement by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- McCabe v. Union Dime Savings BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosenstein v. Mechanics & Farmers BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981