Legal Opinion

Crow v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1993No. CA 91-479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In an unpublished opinion, handed down on December 23,1992, we reversed the above case and remanded it to the Workers’ Compensation Commission for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Keller v. L.A. Darling Fixtures, 40 Ark. App. 94, 845 S.W.2d 15 (1992).

Counsel for appellant has now filed a motion for attorney’s fee under the provisions of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-715(b) (1987). That provision will apply “if the claimant prevails on appeal” at the “appellate court” level. Thus, the question presented is whether our remand for reconsideration means that the claimant prevailed in his appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Gina Marie Farms v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Fisher v. TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crow v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Belcher v. Holiday InnCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API