Legal Opinion

Crow v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1993No. CA 91-479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellee has filed a motion asking that we - stay the enforcement of the order requiring the payment of an attorney’s fee “until appellee has exhausted all judicial review of the issue to which it is entitled.”

This motion goes back to an unpublished opinion which we issued in this case on December 23, 1992. In that opinion we remanded this case to the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission for reconsideration in light of an opinion we issued in Keller v. L.A. Darling Fixtures, 40 Ark. App. 94, 845 S.W.2d 15 (1992).

After we remanded the present case, the appellant filed a motion for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keller v. L. A. Darling FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Crow v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alcorn, Damien LamontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API