Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. California Board of Barbering & Cosmetology

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 2, 1997No. Civil 97-0138-B(POR)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDERING GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO PLAINTIFF AHNHCA; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO PLAINTIFF CORN-WELL; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 45 DAYS LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This matter came on regularly for hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs are represented by David Kleinfeld and Richard Segal of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro LLP and by Clint Bolick and Donna Matías of the Institute for Justice. Defendants are represented by Kathleen Lam, Deputy Attorney General for the State of California. After careful consideration of the…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cornwell v. HamiltonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
  4. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. LockyerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API