Legal Opinion
DiCiacco v. DiCiacco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
“When parties enter into stipulations resolving custody issues, those stipulations ‘will not be modified unless there is a sufficient change in circumstances since the time of the stipulation, and unless modification of the custody arrangement is in the best interests of the children’ ” (Mathie v Mathie, 65 AD3d *938527, 529 [2009], quoting Matter of Said v Said, 61 AD3d 879, 880 [2009] [emphasis added]). In this case, the Family Court improperly considered testimony regarding events alleged to have occurred prior to the parties’ stipulation of settlement (see Matter of Guerra v Balistreri,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Said v. SaidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Risman v. LinksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Mathie v. MathieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Guerra v. BalistreriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kiernan v. KiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Retamozzo v. MoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Newton v. McFarlaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Brink v. BrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Hugee v. GadsdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.