Legal Opinion
Transport Workers' Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-0389, 87-0446, 87-0448 and 87-0455PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
In these consolidated actions, upon the application of plaintiffs 1 and upon hearing, defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) was preliminarily enjoined, on February 9,1987, from implementing a random drug testing program of its employees under SEPTA Order No. 87-1. Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a). Thereafter, SEPTA modified its proposed program and moved to vacate the injunction. Additional evidentiary hearings occurred during which SEPTA made further changes in the program. The parties agreed to an adjudication for permanent injunctive…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Schaill ex rel. Kross v. Tippecanoe County School Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Schaill v. Tippecanoe County School CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.