Legal Opinion
Schaill ex rel. Kross v. Tippecanoe County School Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 14, 1988No. 88-1288PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, plaintiffs-appellants Darcy Schaill and Shelley Johnson challenge a random urinalysis program instituted by the defendant-appellee Tippecanoe County School Corporation (“TSC”). Appellants allege that the TSC urinalysis program violates their rights under the fourth amendment and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. After conducting a trial on the merits of appellants’ claims, the district court ruled that the TSC program was constitutional. We affirm.
I
The essential facts of this case are undisputed, and…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Heyne v. Metropolitan Nashville Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Western Conference of Teamsters v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.