Legal Opinion

Noble v. Harnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of plaintiffs’ intestate, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appellants’ evidence adduced upon the trial of this action, based upon an unwitnessed fatal accident, is at best as consistent with the absence of any wrongful act upon the part of respondents contributing thereto as with its presence. (Wieland v. Third Ave. Tr. Corp., 270 App. Div. 885, affd. 296 N. Y. 1047; Lamb v. Union My. Co., 195 N. Y. 260, 266; Digelormo v. Weil, 260 N. Y. 192, 200.) Present —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Digelormo v. WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Lamb v. Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Wieland v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Wieland v. Third Avenue Transit CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API