Wieland v. Third Avenue Transit Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Assuming that the evidence was sufficient to justify an inference that deceased was struck by a trolley car, it is not sufficient to justify a further inference that the contact was due to negligence of the operator of the car. The suggestion is made that the deceased was crossing the street from west to east, was struck on his right side by a northbound trolley; therefore, he must have crossed in front of the trolley and the operator was negligent in not seeing him. While deceased must have undertaken an east…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Paris Theriot v. Mrs. Wanda MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Klein v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Hawkins v. Brooklyn-Caledonian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lowy v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
- Noble v. HarnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951