Legal Opinion
Canal Insurance v. Montello, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 2011No. Case 10-CV-411-JHP-TLWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
JAMES H. PAYNE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant National Indemnity Company’s (“NICO”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 88), Defendani/Third-Party Plaintiff Montello, Inc.’s Response to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 90), and NICO’s Reply to Montello’s Response (Docket No. 91). For the reasons cited herein, NICO’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED.
FACTS and PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case was instigated as a declaratory judgment action by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Canal Insurance Company (“Canal”) against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Ass'n of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Inc. v. Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Colonial American Life Insurance v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nepco Forged Products, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- India.com, Inc. v. DalalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Osterhout v. MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2023