Listanski v. Canton Charter Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentJ. Stempien, J.
(dissenting).I respectfully dissent.
The opinion of the majority would establish that *360as a matter of public policy, the public highways for use by pedestrians may be left in such a state of disrepair so as to be hazardous to public health, safety, and welfare. The Legislature has carved out a statutory exception to governmental immunity for the public use of its highways. Therein the Legislature defined highways to include sidewalks, MCL 691.1401(e); MSA 3.996(101)(e). Obviously,' in so doing, the Legislature considered the health, safety, and welfare of pedestrians as important as the health,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Jones v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Michonski v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Union Township v. City of Mount PleasantMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.