Legal Opinion · Dissent

Listanski v. Canton Charter Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1994No. Docket 154045Published

1DissentJ. Stempien, J.

(dissenting).I respectfully dissent.

The opinion of the majority would establish that *360as a matter of public policy, the public highways for use by pedestrians may be left in such a state of disrepair so as to be hazardous to public health, safety, and welfare. The Legislature has carved out a statutory exception to governmental immunity for the public use of its highways. Therein the Legislature defined highways to include sidewalks, MCL 691.1401(e); MSA 3.996(101)(e). Obviously,' in so doing, the Legislature considered the health, safety, and welfare of pedestrians as important as the health,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scheurman v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jones v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Michonski v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Union Township v. City of Mount PleasantMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API