Siebert v. Leonard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court for Ramsey county overruling their demurrer to the complaint. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
Plaintiff and defendants entered into a sealed contract, whereby plaintiff agreed with defendants “to do or cause to be done all the excavation and masonry, ■including all brick and stone work, furnishing all miterials for the same, except cut stone, for the erection and com*435pletion of a three story business house ” in Saint Paul, in accordance with plans and specifications and details of the same. Plaintiff was to receive $2,820, to be paid as follows: $200, when the excavation was completed; $300, when the basement and cellar walls were completed; $500, when the first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mead v. DegolyerNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Clark v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Lawrence v. DoleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Knight v. WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Wise v. QuinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Mannella v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Stees v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Siebert v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.