Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1961No. [App. No. 6, September Term, 1961 (Adv.).]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this application for leave to appeal from the order denying post conviction relief from his imprisonment for larceny, the applicant contends (i) that he is innocent; (ii) that he did not testify in his own behalf because his court-appointed counsel directed him not to do so; (iii) that he was convicted on the perjured testimony of the complaining witness; and (iv) in the alternative, the applicant seeks the grant of a lesser sentence or probation.

As to the claim of innocence, involving as it does the sufficiency of the evidence, the statute specifically provides that the post conviction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. D'ONOFRIOCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Barbee v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Rahe, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Rayne v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Fisher v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Husk v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API