Legal Opinion
Schiffahartsgesellschaft Leonhardt & Co. v. A. Bottacchi S.A. De Navegacion
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 21, 1984No. 83-8019PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNNE, District Judge:
This appeal involves the chameleon-like concept of procedural due process. While recent Supreme Court discussions on the subject are devoted to common law garnishment, attachment, and sequestration actions, the court below dealt with Supplemental Rule for Admiralty B(l), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which authorizes the attachment of maritime property to obtain jurisdiction over a foreign defendant. In this instance, the appellant, Schiffahrtsgesellschaft, attached an Argentine vessel, the M/V Puntas Malvinas, purportedly belonging to the appellee, Bottacchi, when…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Trans-Asiatic Oil Ltd. S.A. v. Apex Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TpiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Schiffahartsgesellschaft Leonhardt & Co. v. A. Bottacchi S.A. De NavegacionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.