Legal Opinion

Harvel v. District Court in & for County of Jefferson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 3, 1968No. 23579PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

This is an original proceeding in which this court issued a rule directed to the above named respondents, requiring them to show cause why the purported service of summons, allegedly made upon Zelda L. Harvel in an action for personal injuries, should not be quashed. Harvel was named as defendant in an action brought by respondents Boe, Lehman, Bankston and Christophersen in the District Court of Jefferson County. The return of service of summons stated that service was made by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint “* * * with Jeanette Melcher a member of the family of the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Gibbs v. IsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Bardahl Manufacturing Corp. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Panos Investment Co. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Davis v. Eighth Judicial Dist. of State of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cook v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Denver School District No. 1Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. ReMine ex rel. Liley v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API