Reyes v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
When reviewing a prison disciplinary decision, this Court must decide only whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]; Matter of Igartua v Selsky, 41 AD3d 717 [2007]; Matter of De La Cruz v Selsky, 36 AD3d 907 [2007]; Matter of Ramsey v Phillips, 11 AD3d 470 [2004]; Matter of Glover v Goord, 262 AD2d 483, 484 [1999]). Substantial evidence “means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact” (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- MATTER OF HUGHES v. Suffolk County Dep't of Civil Serv.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Johnson v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gilzene v. McGinnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farooq v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Stephens v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Mabry v. E. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Craig J. Weymer v. New York State Division of State PoliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.