Legal Opinion
Mabry v. E. Maddox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The determination of the Hearing Officer was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Reyes v Goord, 49 AD3d 546 [2008]; Matter of Igartua v Selsky, 41 AD3d 717 [2007]). There is no evidence in this record that the petitioner was denied her right to call witnesses or otherwise deprived of due process of law.
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reyes v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Igartua v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Applegate v. HeathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Carlisle v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Carlisle v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Charles v. Rockland County SheriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018