Legal Opinion

In Re the Custody of Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1968No. 68SC160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The attorney for mother appellant in his brief sets out sixteen questions as being involved. Nothing would be gained by enumerating the sixteen questions and answering each in detail.

The evidence in the case is voluminous and sharply conflicting and reveals considerable bitterness on the part of both father and mother. A recital of the evidence would serve no useful purpose.

“The question of custody is one addressed to the trial court. When the court finds that both parties are fit and proper persons to have custody of the children involved, as it did here, and then finds that it is to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Custody of PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Greer v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. In Re the Custody of OwenbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Latoya Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API