Legal Opinion

Melzner v. Toman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPure, J.

This is an action to recover a broker’s commission upon the sale of real estate.

The plaintiff is a real estate dealer in Mandan, in business for some twenty years. The defendant, the owner of the house and lot involved, filled out a blank form of agency furnished by the agent, which written agreement after describing the real estate, says:

“In consideration of the expense of advertising and making efforts to sell said land I hereby appoint and engage John Melzner, of Mandan, N. Dak., my exclusive agent to procure a buyer for me for said real estate for the sum of $2,600, Twenty Six Hundred, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rokusek v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Larson v. NewmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Little v. LittleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Embden State Bank v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Grangaard v. BetzinaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kruger v. SoreideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Biby v. Union National Bank of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Johnson v. ArithsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Connors v. DagielSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API