Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. Nichols
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Mrs. Nichols obtained judgment in summary process evicting the Blanchards from a tenement occupied by them, and they bring this writ of error to reverse that judgment. The very limited character of the issues before this court on a writ of error without a bill of exceptions has been recently pointed out. Putterman v. Miller, 133 Conn. 70, 72, 48 A. 2d 235; Rosa v. Cristina, 135 Conn. 364, 365, 64 A. 2d 680; and see O’Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co., 132 Conn. 613, 619, 46 A. 2d 343. All of the assignments of error which merit discussion relate to the overruling of the Blanchards’ demurrer to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santoro v. KleinbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Rosa v. CristinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Cary v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Putterman v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Doyle v. a P Realty CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Frasca v. BasileConnecticut Superior Court · 1967
- Milledge v. Standard Mattress Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.