Legal Opinion
United States v. Carl Emmitt Prichard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1986No. 84-2326PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Carl Emmitt Prichard appeals his conviction in district court of attempted bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal he claims that: (1) his acts did not proceed past preparation and thus could not constitute an attempt, and (2) the district court should have held an evidentia-ry hearing to determine whether conversations between witnesses warranted a new trial.
In early April 1984, Prichard and Michael Windsor planned to rob a bank and also to rob the manager of a bowling alley. Unbeknownst to Prichard, Windsor was a paid FBI informant. Throughout…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert Jackson, William Scott and Martin AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill CrummeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Carl Emmitt PrichardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jessie BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.