Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl Emmitt Prichard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1989No. 87-2867PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Per curiam

Carl Emmitt Prichard was convicted following a bench trial of attempted bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Prichard, 781 F.2d 179 (10th Cir.1986). Prichard now appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 1 . In the motion to vacate, which was filed with an accompanying memorandum brief, Prichard articulated his grounds for relief as follows:(1) Rule 23(a), F.R.C.P. was violated to defendant’s prejudice by the failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Raisa R. Mayes v. David A. Leipziger and Levy, Leipziger & NormintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Carl Emmitt PrichardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Eugene A. NolanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Lewis Aaron CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Scott A. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API