Legal Opinion
Yang v. Odom
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 15, 2004No. 03-2951PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Pedro Yang, Carol Jackson, and Peter Kelsch, one member of each of three would-be subclasses in this class action, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated individuals, appeal the District Court’s refusal to toll the applicable statute of limitations during the pendency of a prior, substantively identical suit. Absent tolling, this second suit is time-barred.
The Northern District of Georgia denied class certification to all three subclasses in the earlier class action because it found the original lead plaintiffs, or the subclass itself,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Ari Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- China Agritech, Inc. v. ReshSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.