Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Walsh/Granite JV
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
JUDGE McCullough
I respectfully, dissent from the Majority’s thoughtful resolution of the narrow issue presented on appeal: whether section 9111 of the Public-Private Transportation Partnership Law (P3 Law),1 74 Pa.C.S. § 9111,2 exempts from disclosure the proposals of unsuccessful bidders made in *432connection with a bridge project, after the Department of Transportation (Department) awarded the contract. The Majority concludes that section 9111 shields this information from public inspection.
The objective of the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)3 “is to empower citizens by affording…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. ShaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Karoly v. MancusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- J. Ali v. Philadelphia City Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.