Cruickshank & Co. v. Dutchess Shipping Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:
This is the second time this case has come before us. On the earlier appeal the corporate defendants, Dutchess Shipping Co., Ltd. (“Dutchess”) and International Ship Management, Inc. (“ISM”), did not appeal, but we reversed and dismissed the complaint as against the individual defendant, Stavros Sorros. Cruickshank & Co., Ltd. v. Sorros, 765 F.2d 20 (2d Cir.1985). Now, movant-appellants, who are not parties to the action, but who are the directors and officers of the corporate defendants, seek to intervene and gain the benefit of our decision in favor of Sorros…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Elizabeth Annat v. Daniel B. Beard and Warren J. Hamilton, Elizabeth Annat v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Cruickshank & Co., Limited v. SorrosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Cruickshank & Co. v. Dutchess Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Jones v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Cipolla v. County of RensselaerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. Bank Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.