Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Ruskin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1986No. 61359PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

In this action for medical malpractice brought by the plaintiffs, Michael and Nancy Goldberg and their child Jeffrey, against Stephen B. Ruskin, M.D., and his employer, Strauss Surgical Group Associates, S.C., recovery was sought on the child’s behalf for general damages for his wrongful life. The circuit court of Cook County dismissed that part of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal (128 Ill. App. 3d 1029), and we allowed the plaintiffs’ petition for leave to appeal (103 Ill. 2d R. 315(a)).

According to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cromley v. Bd. of Educ. of LockportDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Williams v. University of Chicago HospitalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Wilson v. KuenziSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API