Legal Opinion

Garnier v. Chester

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1995No. E013239Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

Former wife appeals from a trial court order which states that former husband’s obligation to provide support for the minor daughter of the parties is to terminate no later than the daughter’s 19th birthday. Under the original Oregon judgment of dissolution, support was to continue until the daughter reached the age of 21 provided she attended school up to that time. Appellant argues that the California court abused its discretion by modifying the Oregon support order in the absence of a request for modification. We agree with appellant.

Facts

Appellant Judy Yvonne Chester…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Elkind v. ByckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Ganschow v. GanschowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API