Legal Opinion

Matysek v. Medders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1969No. 7928, 7929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENTON, Chief Justice.

These two causes were brought to recover for permanent damages to the substrata fresh water formation under plaintiffs’ land polluted by salt water from adjoining land. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the defendants. The two causes below have been consolidated for appeal by agreement of the parties. The two causes involve the same land and were filed by members of the same family who held different interests in the land at the time of the filing. One suit was filed June 8, 1967 and the second suit was filed June 12, 1967.

The Matyseks are the owners of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beck v. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Geochemical Surveys v. DietzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Kolberg v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Crawford v. YeattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Bayouth v. Lion Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API