Patterson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EWING WERLEIN, JR., District Judge.
Pending are defendants The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s (“Prudential”) and AON Employee Benefit Committee’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 44). After having considered the motion, response, 1 the applicable law, and the administrative record, Defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. Background
Plaintiff Andrew Patterson claims, pursuant to ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), that Prudential wrongly-denied his continuing long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under AON’s Group Disability Insurance plan (the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Yip v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021