Legal Opinion

AURITT v. AURITT

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 23, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00471Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GARY AURITT, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:18-cv-00471-DBH ) SHANNON AURITT, ) ) Defendant ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In this case arising from disputes over intellectual property rights in the plumbing fixture industry, pro se defendant Shannon Auritt moves for summary judgment as to all four claims against her by her ex-husband Gary Auritt, see Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”) (ECF No. 106) at 2, 8, 20-21; Amended Complaint (ECF No. 59) ¶¶ 53- 68, and the parties cross-move for summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Elizabeth Fedorczyk v. Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. Royal Caribbean Anders Wilhelmsen and Company Kjell KarlsenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Clarke v. BlaisDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  5. Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Financial Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API